Everyone has a conspiracy theory about 911. Even my cat.
So I thought I would share my cat's theory with the world.
That way, if the authorities get upset about it, they'll have to arrest the cat.
Firstly, we are told that Osama Bin Laden is a very intelligent, highly influential, charismatic guy. Let's call this assumption 'A'.
Secondly we are told that he was directly involved in the 911 tower-ramming. Let's call this assumption 'B'.
Thirdly we are told that we are told that the attacks were against the USA. Let's call this assumption 'C'.
I will now show that A,B and C cannot be simultaneously true. You will have to draw your own inferences about the truth of A,B and C, but you will not be able to escape the fact that not all can be true.
Proof:
If A is true then there was a much more devasting attack that is easily obvious to Bin Laden:
Simply fly one plane into one-tower, and with the other BEND THE STATUE OF LIBERTY. It's actually an easier target.
The American dream would die if Ms Liberty wasn't able to strut her stuff and light the world of freedom of liberty.
Better still, after the one tower falls, the other one would have to be dismantled, and that would take about 10 years.
Thus creating massive, unavoidable, and incredibly long-lived humiliation for the USA. This is powerful stuff.
So my guess is that either Osama is not that bright (not likely), he wasn't involved (rather grey area -- we don't know who was paying), or the attack wasn't necesarily *against* the USA.
Don't forget, the stock markets had been in terminal decline for weeks before the strike, and shortly afterwards, rose to almost record levels, way, way above anywhere they had been in the weeks and months before.
Looks like some healthy bloodletting to me.
Pretty cool cat hey?